Thursday, March 7, 2019
RH Bill: Hanging in the Balance Essay
The Philippines for the longest time has been torn by two, not needfully opposing, but somehow different, forces the church service and the earth. Though there has been a command on the inviolable separation of these entities , more often than not, when societal issues confronting the states political affairs fall under moral dilemmas, the church can not help coming into the scene.This is the same case contingency with the seasons national concern House Bill 96, differently known as the Reproductive Health, Responsible Parenthood and Population and study Act .Banking on the potentials of the say bill to drastically minimize the aviate population of the country, the Aquino administration openly admitted its all-out support for the bills being enacted into law. This could be done, as the bill suggests, through maintaining feedom of informed choice wherein parents, couples and women enjoy the liberty or option of choosing from a menu of new-fashioned natural and artificial fam ily planning methods which are medically safe, legal, accessible, affordable and effective.This caused the moralist groups, headed by the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines, to react violently. They expressed apprehensions that such a bill was by nature promoting looser morals that would eventually lead to a morally-corrupt society. The inculcation of sex education in the academic curriculum is plain unorthodoxical, and as such, is morally unacceptable.However the bills proponents contented that the said bill is not what the moralist pictured it to be. That it is about the governments wholesome response to reproductive health concerns that for ages have been left unattended, and which were held responsible for the rapid proliferation ofthe Filipino race and the perennial poverty that goes with it.The discussion whitethorn seen endless as each party stands firm on the ideals it represents. besides at the days end, it would always be up to the person couple, the direc t recipients of such a bill, to decide for theselves whether or not to hold fast to the proposals of whom. It is just hoped that their decision is designed based on how it would serve the matrimony best and the countrys welfare in general.