Tuesday, March 19, 2019
The Science Of Superstitions :: essays research papers
<a href="http//www.geocities.com/vaksam/">Sam Vaknins Psychology, Philosophy, Economics and Foreign Affairs Web SitesThe moot between corporealism and anti-realism is, at least, a century old. Does Science come upon the real world or are its theories true only deep down a current abstract framework? Is science only slavish or empirically adequate or is there more to it than that? Jose Ortega y Gasset said (in an unrelated exchange) that all ideas stem from pre-rational beliefs. William James concurred by reflexion that accepting a truth often requires an act of will which goes beyond facts and into the realm of feelings. Maybe so, but is there is little doubt directly that beliefs are somehow involved in the formation of many scientific ideas, if not of the very endeavour of Science. After all, Science is a charitable activity and humans always look at that things exist (=are true) or could be true. A distinction is traditionally made between look at in some things existence, truth, value of appropriateness (this is the way that it ought to be) and believing that something. The last mentioned is a propositional attitude we think that something, we wish that something, we feel that something and we believe that something. accept in A and believing that A - are different. It is reasonable to simulate that belief is a limited affair. Few of us would tend to believe in contradictions and falsehoods. Catholic theologians talk ab by explicit belief (in something which is know to the believer to be true) versus implicit one (in the known consequences of something whose truth cannot be known). Truly, we believe in the probability of something (we, thus, express an opinion) or in its certain existence (truth). All humans believe in the existence of connections or relationships between things. This is not something which can be proven or proven false (to use Poppers test). That things consistently follow each another(prenominal) does not pr ove they are related in any objective, real, manner except in our minds. This belief in some send (if we define order as permanent relations between dissever physical or abstract entities) permeates both Science and Superstition. They both believe that there must be and is a connection between things out there. Science limits itself and believes that only certain entities inter-relate within well defined conceptual frames (called theories). Not everything has the potential to connect to everything else. Entities are discriminated, differentiated, classified and assimilated in worldviews in accordance with the types of connections that they forge with each other.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment