Children Need to Play, Not Compete

Everyone wants to win. But should that be a childs top priority? Childrens pleasures should be more focused on cooperation and pure fun. The physical and psychological negatives argon not worth the purport of winning a game or making a team. warring sports have too many another(prenominal) negatives that outweigh the positives and should be either removed(p) or restructured. After children are fully prepared and ment entirelyy and psychologically developed, by age twelve or so, children can move on to acting to win. Children postulate to Play, Not Compete by Jessica Statsky is an explanation as to why children sports enquire to be less belligerent.The stress of winning seems to be getting worse and worse as time goes on. Children are losing the contend for sports because the fun is slowly but surely being taken away. Statsky states that, veritable(a) when children are not injured, fear of being prejudice detracts from their enjoyment of the sport. in that respect are al so psychological issues, which shouldnt be a puzzle children have to deal with. Sports should be somewhat of an outlet, an escape for children to enjoy themselves obscure from their everyday life, not an added stress.As Statsky ads, Winning and losing may be an inevitable subdivision of adult life, but they should not be a part of childhood. childishness is a time for making memories, participating in things that make children happy, and enjoying their time. or else of stressing just close to winning, practicing, losing, making the team, and getting hurt, children should purely be having fun playing the sports that they love. Jessica Statsky presents a very reasonable and logical argument. It is hard to disagree with her pedestal after reading the article.All of her examples were relevant and accurate. Statsky ties together her opinion along with facts and statistics. She makes some(prenominal) references to various books and authors and even sources such as the Los Angele s Times. Jessica Statsky has information from a upstart York Little League official, which shows that from California to New York, this is an issue that is being dealt with all over the country. Statsky also has information from a professor of kinesiology, Dr. Glyn C. Roberts, at the install of Child Behavior and Development at the University of Illinois.Her arguments are very compelling and well worded. Over all, Statsky has put together a very well-constructed article. Children Need to Play, Not Compete appeals to readers emotions. Children are a part of just about everyones lives. Everyone was a child once, and either has or knows someone who has children. No one wants to think about a child being hurt physically or emotionally. Although parents often get involved in the entrust to win, it is more important that children have positive experiences and wait until they are ripe(p) enough to have winning become a priority.Statsky refers to Martin Rablovsky, a occasion sports ed itor for the New York Times who said after the coaches whistle blows, The inwardness of play suddenly disappears, and sport become job like. Parents dont want to see their children lose interest in a sport they love because of all the pressure. It is a fairly reasonable assumption to set up that parents would rather their children have fun without the addition of winning, then to be accented or harmed just to have that win.Parents could still praise their children for perform well and see how much better they will develop and be prepared for competition later in life. There are many points in Children Need to Play, Not Compete that are easily agreeable. It is received that between the ages of six and twelve, children shouldnt be involved in competitive sports. Statsky states, One readily understandable danger of overly competitive sports is that sincerely entice children into physical actions that are bad for growing bodies. Children do so much growing in this time period. Th ey dont need negative physical and psychological impacts from sports at such an important floor in life. Children should be taught cooperation, sportsmanship, and individual performance to prepare them for competition when they are developed enough to handle it. Everyone wants to be able to look hind end on childhood and have good memories. Sports programs should reconsider and reconstruct to leave to childrens needs and abilities. No one wants to see the love of sports slowly disappear over time.Children have their whole lives to compete. Childhood should be about pure innocent fun and making positive memories. Sports dont need to completely change. It would help if the level of competition progressed as the childrens age and abilities progressed. That way they could be gradually becoming prepared for game school, college, or even professional sports in their future. If taking steps toward reconstructing childrens competitive sports is going to benefit children, then that is wh at needs to be done.